Skip to content
Theory

ESG vs Sustainability Strategy

3 min read Exercise

ESG reporting is not sustainability. It measures the past. Sustainability strategy transforms the future. Confusing the two is one of the most expensive mistakes organizations make today, and entire industries are built on maintaining that confusion.

ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. It originated in 2006 from the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) as a financial risk management tool designed for investors. Its purpose was never to make companies sustainable. It was to help investors assess which companies might be risky bets due to environmental liabilities, social controversies, or governance failures.

The problem is that accounting firms and consulting houses saw a market. KPMG alone invested over $1.5 billion in ESG services. The Big 4 (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) collectively turned ESG into a compliance industry worth tens of billions annually. Marketing budgets drove the confusion: companies started believing that having a good ESG report meant they were sustainable. It does not.

What ESG Actually Measures

ESG reports tell you what an organization has been doing. They measure past performance against standards like GRI, TCFD, SASB, ISSB, and ESRS. They are snapshots: how much CO2 did you emit last year, what is your board diversity, do you have an anti-corruption policy.

This is not unimportant. Transparency matters. But measuring what happened last year tells you nothing about whether you are on a trajectory toward sustainability. A company can have an excellent ESG report and still be doing terrible work. A company doing genuinely transformative work may have no ESG report at all.

As Tom puts it: "ESG reporting is simply a very small, not unimportant, but a very small part of this in which you show to the world what you have been doing... I know companies that are basically doing a terrible job that have great ESG reports and I know companies doing a great job that don't have one at all."

What Sustainability Strategy Actually Requires

A genuine sustainability strategy is a long-term transformation roadmap, not a compliance exercise. It requires understanding the organization as a system embedded in larger systems, then figuring out how to use the organization as a means to transition society toward a more sustainable state.

The SiD approach to sustainability strategy uses five steps:

  1. System Mapping: Understanding how the organization influences and is influenced by society as a whole.
  2. Context-Based Goals: Setting goals not from internal benchmarks but from what the system actually needs.
  3. Stakeholder Co-Creation: Involving affected parties in defining the path forward.
  4. Transition Roadmap: Planning on a 20-30 year timescale, not a 5-year investment horizon.
  5. Implementation with Feedback Loops: Acting, measuring, learning, and adapting continuously.

The difference is fundamental. ESG asks: "How do we report on what we did?" Sustainability strategy asks: "How do we transform what we do?"

If you need your bike fixed, go to a bicycle repair shop, not to a bakery. ESG consultants are bakers. They are good at what they do. But it is not sustainability.

The Progression of Understanding

It helps to think of sustainability understanding in stages:

  • 1.0 (Object-oriented): "I need to stop using plastic bags." Focused on individual products and materials.
  • 2.0 (ESG/Integrated): "We need to report on environmental, social, and governance factors." Broader, but still measuring and reporting.
  • 3.0 (Network-level): "We need to understand our supply chains and manipulate network effects." Starting to think systemically.
  • 4.0 (Systemic/Holistic): "Society is an organism. We need to understand its behavior and transform our role within it." This is where real sustainability work begins.

Most organizations are operating somewhere between 1.0 and 2.0. The world needs them at 4.0.

Key sustainability milestones that ESG does not reference: Limits to Growth (1972), the Brundtland Report (1987), Planetary Boundaries (2009). These represent the scientific foundation of sustainability understanding. ESG floats on top of this without engaging with it.

This knowledge is free because of our supporters. Join them.

This content is free and open, made possible by our supporters. Support SiD
← Previous ELSI in Practice Next → Network Autonomy: Self-Sufficiency to Efficiency
SiD Tutor
Your learning guide
Welcome to SiD Learning. I am here to help you explore and understand the material. What would you like to discuss?